Notes on Deleuze and Guattari: A Thousand Plateaus

Segmentarity is when we divide things up, into segments. There are countless ways you can divide things. It depends what you’re trying to do.

Segmentarity works “in a circular fashion,” in ever wider circles, or “in a linear fashion.” When circular the segments proceed outward, like me, my street, my town, my country, the world, the galaxy … So when I’m right at the centre I belong to the outer circles too. Linear segmentarity, on the other hand, means you “proceed” from one point to the next, moving on to one segment and leaving another behind. I leave my street, and go to another street to enter my workplace. Circularly, I’m still in my town, my country … But linearly I’ve moved because I’ve moved to another street.

Linear segmentarity means you’re here, and not there. Anything can be divided into segments, you just need to want to do it. So society is divided up: home, work, school, and so on, describe different places for activity. When you’re in school, you’re not at home, and so different rules apply. “You’re not at home anymore,” Deleuze and Guattari write: this is what they tell you when you’re at school, or when you’re in the army. You’re here, and not there, and so different rules apply.

“Man” and “woman” describe segments too. “Be a man!” is intended to remind you what side you belong to, what segment you stand upon. Again, so that you know what rules you’re supposed to be following. If you feel that people need rules to follow, dividing things up is a method for justifying these rules. Divide and conquer.

In our society, we do this to ourselves, we know how the segments are divided. And many of us know that these divisions are man-made, but we treat them often as if they were the work of Nature, and unalterable. Because if it turned out we were making all this up ourselves, and that we were capable of making new division and new rules, what sense would there be in following the rules we have?

This entry was posted in books, Philosophy and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Notes on Deleuze and Guattari: A Thousand Plateaus

  1. rickkoster says:

    Really interesting – thanks.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Therese says:

    Very interesting, Lee. Thanks for sharing. But don’t you think segments are necessary?

    Liked by 1 person

    • leewatkins says:

      Thanks for your comment! Yes, I do think segments are necessary, but as with a lot of things we call “necessary,” it depends what you’re trying to do. I think it can be harmful to accept ready-made divisions and distinctions, when you might be able to create better ones for yourself.

      Like

  3. Is the division between man and woman, or any other ‘binary,’ an example of linear segmentarity then?

    Like

    • leewatkins says:

      Hi, thanks for reading. A binary division would be linear, yes. Whether the division between man and woman is binary is another question. Setting up a binary distinction between two things, so you must be one thing and not the other, can be a mechanism for controlling individual behaviour.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.